I don’t get this discussion. What applies to some doesn’t apply to all. I know a guy who lived in Vienna with small kids and no car. I’m sure if you live in a large european city, you can manage without a car, if your flat is located in a convenient area.
I think when the self-driving market develops, there will be options for families too. After all, what would stop a family from using a robotaxi? If you need to keep your stuff in there, you can rent it for the day. If you really use the car a lot, sure, own one. But we’re talking about large scale trends, not edge cases!
yes it seems controversial - but no, sorry, I was not spreading lies, neither got manipulated. I basically posted what I found where it belongs and you seem to have countered it, very well.
Now, on the same topic: do you need FSD or Autopilot turned on to actually stop for pedestrians? Because if so, that’s even less useful than in normal cars, most of which actually stop for peds no matter the circumstance.
Car logs and video footage have shown that FSD was engaged, but the driver was holding the gas pedal. FSD detected the obstacle and was urging the driver to react. FSD beta does not override human corrections. It’s the other way round: the human can always override what the beta is doing. And that is in line with the disclaimer when you agree to the terms of fsd beta program. YOU are responsible and you are in control. Will you agree, that for a beta software it makes sense that the car never ignores driver input?
This scam was sponsored by a billionaire Dan O’Dowd who, if I’m not mistaken, sells components to legacy car manufacturers. So he has skin in the game, and he has smeared Tesla multiple times. The damage is done, regardless of the truth. Scam like this is produced, so that people who are looking for something to hate Tesla for, can find it and then post it with smug satisfaction, without double-checking.
I wonder why this kind of scam are legal. It’s “mathematically” clear that it is a scam. I mean, an AI could decide on such cases, no need to expensive lawyers.
The manual says so
You do the opposite
You publish a video stating something wrong
It is not meant to be comedy or joke.
What could say the defense? They didn’t read the manual?
I don’t think they are legal. They could get sued, but then you need to prove how many people got misinformed and how big was the damage to the brand. That’s not something you can magically automate.
What you read in the news today is often not true, it is put there either to generate clicks or to form an opinion (sponsored). Take for example the slandering articles about buying a horse for a handjob or banging Brin’s wife. Bullshit Insider is known for such fake stories.
I’m not buying right now, so your short will just enrich some other traders, I guess. Or you can even get rich, who knows what will the market do in the next months. TSLA price can drop to $700 again, very possible, and then you will have made the right call.
I may be a deluded TSLA bull, but what can you say about this guy?
If I remember correctly, Cathie Wood’s TSLA bull-case assumed that batteries keep getting cheaper. The price of lithium is up tenfold over the last two years. Presumably, these prices will come back down somewhat when there’s more mining output, but right now this probably hurts margin’s a lot.
And I’m not sure how much they can raise their prices, because I also read that lead times for Teslas have dropped significantly and you can now get certain models within weeks in some places. (I haven’t verified this)
Maybe it’s because of some new tax credits in 2023 and people are waiting for that, but who knows.
Mit dem Lesen und der Teilnahme an diesem Forum bestätigst du, dass du die Forum-Richtlinien gelesen hast und damit einverstanden bist sowie den Haftungsausschluss auf http://www.mustachianpost.com/de/ akzeptierst.
