Chronicles of 2025

Got it

Still taxing money twice is not very interesting concept. Seems like punishment for foreigners living in US.

The extra tax is deductible from income tax.

1 Like

Well. For sure tariffs will come.
+10% are already in place and they might apply another 5-10% to most countries

Big economies might apply some counter tariffs and call it a day

Smaller ones should just keep going and let American consumers pay the tariffs. It’s not that those jobs are going to move away to US anyways

Not sure where CH will fit because if Pharma price control comes into play, there wouldn’t be any investments for Swiss Pharma to make in US and maybe no deal in the end.

Where did you see this?
I couldn’t find this written anywhere

All I see is that proposal is to collect 5% from remittances

You should check the proposal, not the media reports.

3 Likes

Okay I have an investment related question

Let’s say US companies continue to be great with innovation and cutting edge technologies. But at same time, US govt cannot manage their debt & either default or take drastic taxation measures to reduce debt.

What would be the impact on S&P 500 in that scenario?

  • S&P can continue to deliver good returns
  • Or S&P would end up suffering too

The question I am asking is how much does Stock market performance depend on national balance sheet.

Probably need to break this down to phases -

  1. while the party is still going, further fueled by government overspending
  2. Growing recognition the party can’t go on (e.g., sovereign downgrades)
  3. Politicians and central bank grudgingly administer bitter medicine (spending cuts, rate- and tax hikes), everyone in hangover

Net impact may be positive in the first phase. After that, rate hikes and confidence crises would make borrowing expensive for companies, bad for stocks. So would be tax hikes, especially on corporations, unless that effect is outweighted by gain in confidence.

Might be murky in practice- perhaps best to run a few crises (Greek euro, Liz Truss premiership, Argentina,
) through AI?

1 Like

I think it’s fair to assume that in a US sovereign debt crisis there’s be a global recession and all stock markets would suffer, earnings forecasts would go down and stock prices would follow, regardless of the innovation, in my opinion, in the short term (which will feel long!).

3 Likes

I was thinking about it. But if there is a debt crisis would rates keep going up? Or there comes a point where lenders have no option but to restructure the debt or face a default.

You don’t have just rates in the equation, dollar would likely lose a lot of value as well.

FWIW as other said I think a US debt crisis would have global impact, US liquidity (dollar, US debt) is what is greasing the wheels of the world’s financial markets.

1 Like


(Source)

What if you panic sold right when things seemed the bleakest right before that crazy 10% up day in early April and then panic bought back in the next day:


(Source)

8 Likes

That is an excellent chart!

1 Like

Potentially slightly dippy day tomorrow.

First it was foreign governments, then it was lawyers , then it was universities, then it was judges who were told what they should do and what they should not do. Now it’s time for corporations.

After Apple was told to stop making iPhones in India and make them in US instead. Seems like now Walmart stock investors would be feeling Yippy.

“Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain,” Trump posted. “Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China they should, as is said, “EAT THE TARIFFS,” and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I’ll be watching, and so will your customers!!!”

2 Likes

Continued:


 Trump’s comments echoed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s comments Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” that “businesses and the countries primarily eat the tariff.”

Nothing as promising as elements of a centrally planned economy, is there?

Treasury Market : Administration 1:0
CEO class : Administration (playing now)

Would be easier to create a tariff refund system (Trump subsidy = tariff paid) rather than telling retailers whose margins are anyways not enough to eat 30% tariffs.

The tariff revenue is already committed towards upcoming tax cuts for those deemed deserving them most.

Walmart’s profit margin in 2024 was about 2.6%. Of course can they absorb the tariffs themselves 
 :zany_face:

3 Likes

I believe the message is that „accept a loss or else
.“


hey
that’s a nice business you got there
would be a terrible shame is something were to happen to it


1 Like