I’ve found a few global bond funds hedged in CHF on Six’s explorer.
For example: iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF - CHF Hedged (Acc) [AGGS / ISIN : IE00BD1JRY91), which seems to be available for purchase at my broker (TradeDirect). A few other funds are available, I haven’t checked if it is a good fund and haven’t searched further since bonds are not yet part of my target allocation.
In my opinion, though, the search for yield in fixed income is a vain endeavour. The risk free rate in CHF is currently negative, anything above that comes with some additional risk, that is taken into account for its price, determining its (expected if not held for the whole duration) returns. We have free lunch with (slightly) positive savings accounts and fixed deposits in CHF, insured by esisuisse up to CHF 100,000 per bank. As a refuge currency, CHF could hold up good in a potential global crash. For swiss investors and under current circumstances, I’d say cash is a good contender for fixed income.
As for myself, I’d rather have safer assets yielding next to nothing allowing me to invest more in risk assets (stocks) than have more risk in my fixed income and less stocks for the same amount of risk as a result.
I think the question is about investing horizon. I’m no bond specialist but when rates rise, existing bonds indeed loose value, but newly issued ones have a better yield, so that on the duration of the bond, both cancel out. If I buy a bond fund with a duration of roughly 7 years, that means that 7 years after a rate rise, I would break even and, from then on, have increased returns. I’m not sure about the etiquette about linking threads of other boards but this one from nisiprius (an amazing source of insight) on the Bogleheads board should count as public service and deserve to be read by anybody pondering bonds and interest rates (read the whole thread, there are very insightful replies too).
A long term investor wouldn’t try to dodge the (potential) temporary loss of value, knowing it still leads where they want to go. Long term investing is about peace of mind. It’s about investing according to our long term goals and risk tolerance, getting into the mindset that intermediary fluctuations don’t matter and letting our investments ride, rebalancing when applicable. It has a proven track record leading to wealth, slowly.
Short term investing is where tactical allocations enter into play. Tactical moves are not a bad thing per se but if we want to play that game, we have to realize that it’s a negative sum game (because of the fees) and it’s akin to sitting at a poker table with all the investors trying to time the market, including institutions with full time employed analysts and traders and access to way more information than we do. Can we win? Sure! Are the odds in our favor? I’d wager that for the vast majority of us, they aren’t.
Safer assets suck for swiss investors right now but we shouldn’t forego them completely and go full risk on that sole ground, doing so may suck even more. 3A solutions could act as a guide here. VIAC uses cash, some gold and some real estate for its less than 100 solutions, Frankly uses bonds (both hedged and unhedged), real estate and commodities (my bet is on gold). Finpension uses hedged bonds and real estate.
I’d spend some time reading the Bogleheads’ board. These guys are really great at voicing reason in storms of panic and make sense of long term investing and staying the course. They don’t brag about it but many of them have a very high net worth to show for their investing career and they are a great source of insight on a very broad range of financial topics.
That’s part of why I wouldn’t advise going for 100 % stocks but to also buy other assets and rebalance. Money has to go somewhere, if it gets out of stocks, you should be able to capture it somewhere else.