once you start withdrawing from your portfolio, you start thinking about incoming cash flow a lot more than you worry about total return (at least I do).
a customized income-oriented portfolio helps immensly with this.
I think this is the key point. There are no brainers. MSFT was a no brainer to my uncle in Greece in the stone age of the 80s where you had to have a broker who was a person youâd call on the phone and ask them to buy or sell something. He was an early programmer (retired now) but he had the foresight that PCs will make it in every home and replace typewriters. Him and my aunt fit the millionaire next door profile to a t. Same home for 40 years, no extravagance, steady saving and investing. I donât know that theyâre millionaires but Iâd expect they are. He definitely had a huge advantage of being an insider in a very new, very niche profession, but thatâs not taking away from the success I imagine he had. By the mid 90s Bill Gatesâs face, the feud with Apple and the US govtâs antitrust proceedings were in mainstream news all the time, even in Greece. Someone could have gotten in MSFT THEN, and become very rich from it. Someone could have gotten in 10 years later in 2005 say and again become very rich. Hell someone could have gotten in in 2015 and be riding great right now!!!
Anyway, as I said above the kicker is the bolded part. I count 4 failures to make it big to date: crypto (4 times, 2010, 2017, 2021 and definitely now), COVID, AI and the fat loss drugs, but I sleep ok with it because I know myself, I just donât have the guts to go big in single stocks/assets. I bought nVidia at $200 and sold at $400, similarly pulled a 2x in Lilly and Novo, and got rid of both because they were stressing me out. I buy VWRL every month with zero stress.
@Your_Full_Name big love for saying what Iâm often saying too, that economics and finance have no place among the real sciences
I see it as a game of poker: we make educated guesses based on game principles and our read of the situation with a risk assessment as to how much to bet on each hand (depending on our own situation (our hand) and the read we have on the situation and the other players).
Playing all games equally with passive index investing is one way to handle it, and not the worst as it relies purely on game principles without being dependent on our ability to read the situation (with strong principles behind the reasoning that stocks, as a whole and on a long term trend should outpace inflation).
Of course, players with strong conviction in their ability to read the situation (and/or the other players) may play it differently.
Edit: thinking about it, I may frame passive investing as âthe houseâ, taking their cut on each transaction while active players take a more âwin or looseâ approach.
Durch das Lesen und die Teilnahme an diesem Forum bestÀtigst du, dass du den auf http://www.mustachianpost.com/de/ dargestellten Haftungsausschluss gelesen hast und damit einverstanden bist.