Yes, I buy them at the same time. USXF / DMXF in the proportion given by the current share of US in Msci world. You can take VEA instead of DMXF though, Europe and Japan are already good at ESG without extra filtering.
Sorry, forgot the crucial „in the US“ in my last post.
But they aren’t cheaper on tax!?
US-domiciled ETFs are usually subject to 15% or 30% withholding tax (although you may often deduct it through the tax declaration as a Swiss-residence investor)
Whereas Irish or Luxembourgish ETFs (usually, for residents of virtually every country) are not subject to withholding tax in the first place?!
For this specific ETF I mentioned above (UIMR) the TER is not bad at all at 0.22% and was also quite surprised to see a relatively low TER for an ETF from UBS. Of course nothing to compare with a Vanguard equivalent such as VEA which has a TER of 0.05%…
EMU ETFs (as mentioned above) aren’t holding US companies - and won’t receive US dividends.
From a tax perspective, EU-domiciled (Irish or Luxembourgish) ETFs will be easier in handling, more favourable when US withholding tax is not deductible and probably at least as favourable or better than US-domiciled ETFs on a fund level.
In in the same situation, I would like to find an ESG version of Vanguard Total World Stock (VT) , US based and I haven’t anything suitable yet. What did you end up choosing for you @San_Francisco.
And @Dr.PI why Vanguard ESG ETFs are bad from your perspective? I am hesitating to pick them up but indeed they aren’t recommended a lot.
Durch das Lesen und die Teilnahme an diesem Forum bestätigst du, dass du den auf http://www.mustachianpost.com/de/ dargestellten Haftungsausschluss gelesen hast und damit einverstanden bist.