Impact of Political Risk (Trump) on your Investment Performance

Totally agree with your story. A clash between these two in the next 6 months is really likely to happen


 or because really, „there can only be one“.

Is the concern larger beyond that point, or during the phase before, the government-big corporate-billlionaires merger, a.k.a. a hallmark of f-cism?

That’s the essence of it, yes.

I put my hopes in the checks and balances of the US system, and separation of powers. Even with the Supreme Court in his pocket I can’t see the US descending into fascism that easily. Their armed forces swear to protect the constitution against enemies both foreign or domestic, this may still have some value
 But I’m always an optimistic!

2 Likes


Yes, yes you did, and these billionaires own Trump now, until he realises it and ditches them, by which point they start
using the methods that brought him to power against him.

Funny thing totalitarianism, intolerance, racism, disrespect of others’ opinions
 Once they’re given a millimeter of space to breathe they rise up and choke the host.

“Whoever sows winds will reap tempests” the Greeks say.

Epic Crash of 2025 loading before our eyes :smiley:

6 Likes

I was thinking there wouldn’t be a US debt ceiling crisis in January with a united White House, House and Senate but these people could still prove me wrong. :laughing:

2 Likes

They’ll be at each other’s throats soon enough. Maybe Americans will realise how they were duped and go crazy. Maybe JPow will turn the printer on big time, maybe not.

My main point is beyond Trump, we have seen how sensitive investors and the market have become to anything other than unicorns and rainbows. I feel any serious jitter will cause a panic
which could be a great opportunity for some.

1 Like

My stance is “always be ready for a market panic” but I don’t hold my “hopes” high: this market should have panicked itself into a long lasting crash quite a few times already and at all points, a new unicorn or rainbow arised to take it higher. This could continue for longer than I can stay solvent.

2 Likes

2025 in one picture:

10 Likes

I am sure most of you saw Zuck seemingly adopting MAGA speech and making changes MAGAs cream on. I feel this is more complicated than it seems at face value. Face value says he’s doing it to keep (or put) himself in the inner circle, considering he’s feuded with Trump before and now may be feeling sidelined by Musk and again in danger from Trump’s vindictiveness.

Not to anger our benevolent mods with going political, I’ll dance around the politics and just say that if we look over at what happened with Musk getting twitter, sinks and all, this could have gazillion-level implications for the stock (as always, in my not at all humble opinion), and with knock-on effects in other industries driving our investments.

Edit: been having the nagging feeling we are in for a clustercoitus for many months now. If it happens it’ll be my first with real skin in the game, 2022 seems dead obvious in hindsight (hindsight is 20/20!), and if this or next year turn out to be a scheisssturm there’ll be so many around the world who could say “hey, I told ya”, highlighting how emotionally difficult it is to time the market. Been going over graphs of crashes for a while to prepare mentally and emotionally, what’s obvious when I looked more closely is that they seem like happening in an instant in a zoomed out chart and how history remembers them, but in reality take months to play out (except 1987 which was a freak drop driven by crude algos messing up). Must be very tough to stay calm.

2 Likes

Recent press conference was unbelievable and frightening

Take Greenland or serious tariffs for Denmark
Take Panama by Military force
Take Canada by economic force
Rename Gulf of Mexico
Force NATO countries to spend 5% on Defence

I am not sure how to read all this. But I feel if the biggest superpower in world gets into bullying mode for whole world and plans to change the world order through economic and military force, we might be in for a very rough period of investments.

When China said all this, people reduced / eliminated their exposure to Chinese stocks. Same for Russia, but what we would do with 60% of world stocks are in US

2 Likes

Well, I suspect unlike if Russia or China behaves this way, I think we’d let the US get away with it and not sanction them in any meaningful way.

1 Like

I hope this ends up being good with Canada , Europe, India and LATAM becoming good friends

3 Likes

I feel the difference, and saw it in smaller scale with the rise of populism and dinner table racism, as the British eloquently describe it, is that we let our shock, indignance and disbelief paralyse us because the things said are so outrageous and out of order that disbelief is the only reasonable initial response. Then we slowly realise they were told with a straight face and go “oh
we’re not friends anymore, I didn’t see that coming”.
If someone told me 10 years ago that the POTUS said he’d annex Canada, and the Canadian PM responded with “No chance in hell” I’d think this was said in some lampoon, by caricature actors and comedians (say, POTUS dressed in a cowboy hat, Canadian PM in a lumberjack shirt).

For all the good some of the MAG7 have done for investors, I’m gradually coming 'round to wondering if (even more) regulation is needed, especially the social media/information ones, maybe even breaking them up as they’ve become unreasonably powerful and each has an enormous moat in their field.

Maybe Bezos and Zuck will become kindly old sages in their older age, like Gates and Buffett, and people will forget they once were stone cold killers. I still have a soft spot for Gates as I feel his foundation is a force for good indeed. I don’t see Musk ever going sane, and Cook, Pichai, Nadella are a lot less public than the other MAG7 bosses.

2 Likes

Once I heard a saying

When the CEO is very media focused, the company start working for the CEO instead of CEO working for the company . In long run it doesn’t work out for company

2 Likes

That’s a good one indeed, but does it hold water? In the end everyone, other than Musk who’s unhinged, has to answer to shareholders.

Clearly too much mainstream media consumption in this thread. I guess some of you were asleep during the last 4 years of Trump. Hint: We survived. Oh, and no new war started, which is also quite exceptional for the US. Oh, and stock market was also pretty good except when the Chinese virus arrived, which of course is also Trump’s fault. But I am very much looking forward to the end of the world (again). :yawning_face:

Just amazingly funny how all of the sudden Musk and Zuckerberg become the bad guys, once they’re no longer promoting far-left lunacy but instead, for example, free speech.

Also some serious TDS in here. Very fun to read.

Most investors and most money come out of the US. They won‘t abandon themselves.

1 Like

FWIW, I don’t expect this thread to be able to stay on track with the forum guidelines


4 Likes

Indeed. The risk has materialized and now we have to live with it. I am closing this thread.

Everyone is welcome to discuss portfolio diversification strategies for example in

3 Likes