Finpension invest – a new robo-advisor for non-3a ETF investments

Thanks for sharing. I did not realize that you can actually have a lower TER by buying multiple ETFs versus buying one ETF.
I did not quite understand your effective fee calc, but I used your TER assumptions & got following numbers for effective yield. I did not account for buy/sell fees.

S&P 500 yield is assumed to be about 1.6% , so i used that for flat credit back. Lower yield will also reduce tax credit

Basically it turns out that SQ = Neon + custody fees (capped at 200 CHF per year)
FP will cost more

World ETF portfolio SQ NEON FP
(a) Gross dividend 2% 2% 2%
(b) Witholding tax (12.5% effective) 0.25% 0.25% 0.25%
(c) Net dividend (a - b) 1.75% 1.75% 1.75%
(d) TER 0.15% 0.15% 0.085%
(e) Custody fees + management fee 0.10% 0% 0.39%
(f) US TAX credit (assuming 67% exposure to S&P 500 & Gross dividend yield of 1.6% for US portion) 0 0 0.161%
(g) Deduction for 3rd party expenses 0.30% 0.30% 0.30%
(h) Taxable income (c - g + f) 1.45% 1.45% 1.61%
Effective yield
(i) Tax @ rate 30% 0.44% 0.44% 0.48%
Effective yield (c + f - d - e - i) 1.07% 1.17% 0.95%
(j) Tax @ rate 40% 0.58% 0.58% 0.64%
Effective yield (c +f -d - e- j) 0.92% 1.02% 0.79%

One time fees -: If i assume 5000 CHF investments at a time, then buy + sell fees for SQ will be 0.4% (assuming 10 CHF ETF leader fee per trade) and Neon will be 0.5% (only at time of sales)

FP I do not know if there is any spread or not. For higher amounts NEON might become expensive at withdrawal but would depend on investment horizon and withdrawal amount tranches.

2 Likes