Biden clearly doesn’t need Michigan AND Pennsylvania. (It’s simple counting of Electoral Votes.)
If Biden gets Michigan, Nevada and Georgia he wins.
You just believe it’s unlikely he will get them.
EDIT:
Your chart is also not up to date in Wisconsin, right?
(Maybe it’s also just a large batch of absentee ballots that turned the state and Trump will still win. It’s only a 0.6% lead after all.)
You can see that there is actually quite some uncertainty about what percentage of the vote has been counted.
For example in Michigan it’s 80-93%. If it’s in fact 80% Biden might have a really good chance, if it’s 93% he probably doesn’t. [EDIT: It seems the data in this tweet was incorrect. Trump still has a larger lead.]
Maybe this is because of how the votes are reported but possible also because nobody really knows how many total votes there are?
The first US democratic election was held in 1789 with George Washington as its first president. So they are doing this a pretty long time and successfully without dropping into a dictatorship or similar. They have checks and balances in place. Electoral college is one way to ensure that the smaller states can put their voice into the vote. We in Switzerland have the *Ständerat" which has a similar effect.
I can only see funnily shaped penises in these graphs and that’s about how I feel about this elections. The choice is between civil unrest / economic war with Trump vs. very likely actual military war with Biden. Both not really affecting me execept for some stock market swings.
By reading and partipating to this forum, you confirm you have read and agree with the disclaimer presented on http://www.mustachianpost.com/
En lisant et participant à ce forum, tu confirmes avoir lu et être d'accord avec l'avis de dégagement de responsabilité présenté sur http://www.mustachianpost.com/fr/
Durch das Lesen und die Teilnahme an diesem Forum bestätigst du, dass du den auf http://www.mustachianpost.com/de/ dargestellten Haftungsausschluss gelesen hast und damit einverstanden bist.