Chronicles of 2025

I think no one is even arguing about the thesis. We understand that being stronger and richer works well in real world

The discussion here mainly was about if it works well in long run too. Only time will tell :slight_smile:

1 Like

Every empire fell eventually.

1 Like

Tbh I’ve never seen an empire attacking its vital parts this way. I mean a working empire. The similary-named-to-my-nickname did something like that (google great chinese famine). It’s the inward thing that is weird imho. And attacking partner nations was usually done in a different way to avoid panicking “the market”.

2 Likes

And 160% in 20 years!

4 Likes

And now capital markets are part of trade war

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/15/trump-tariffs-trade-china-wall-street-00291026

1 Like

65.5% is the number for all of North America. From the beginning of the year to end of March, US is down from 64.7% to 62.7%.

2 Likes

I believe there’s a very high chance of Chinese companies being de-listed.

Eh, if you’re worried about capital markets mess Proposed Republican tax change would lead to spike in costs for Canadians who invest in U.S. securities - The Globe and Mail is fun too. Though as usual that someone tabled a law doesn’t mean it happens.

Paywall


Use archive.is :slight_smile:

I see no paywall here 
 . I see no direct alternative source discussing exactly the same sentiment so you may want to try archive.is, but e.g. another article about the law is Legislative update: Ways and Means Chairman reintroduces bill to impose additional tax if foreign jurisdiction adopts discriminatory or extraterritorial tax

1 Like

What does it change for VT? Anyone can confirm that they are no ADR on their Holdings?

Anyway seems that oversimplification of “VT and chill” is over maybe should I switch to VTI + EXUS + EM IE Fund

I miss the Corona times, you just had to check that website with the numbers going up and up and that’s it. Now you see so many lies here and there and no clear path for anything at all.
I can’t wear a mask to hope that the dollar won’t go down anymore.

I think I might going to sell some USD cash I have lying around. The FX won’t go back. Maybe if @Cortana buys sells some usd? :slight_smile:

4 Likes

Better buy assets denominated in USD, that’d be more productive (that’s what I’m doing, doesn’t mean it’s right).

Either convert to CHF and take the hit or atleast invest them in US MMF or US bonds to not lose further value

I wouldn’t say that oversimplification is over. I think it’s still there

But the way world stock market has evolved, it has made VT very exposed to one country. When world ETF is exposed 65% to one country, it makes you wonder if we can really call it a world ETF.

So yeah if proportion of US in VT is not for your taste / comfort (i am of same opinion), then you might need to split the ETFs to balance the exposure

I did buy some BOXX a while ago with a chunk on a test account. I did check BND and was still too jumpy. MMF is still an unknown thing to me. I did read some posts here and there but it doesn’t look that safe. I might have to buy more boxes maybe.

BND is indeed more jumpy, if it’s a short term thing I’d buy BIL (BOXX is more tax efficient, apparently, but I don’t claim to understand it so I stayed away), in fact I was close to buy BIL but then decided to buy ZGLD as I don’t want more US/USD exposure than I already have.

BND has a very long duration. You need to hold it for a very long time to lock in the yield.

Indeed! Thanks for correcting me.

I think the concept behind “VT and chill” is that you own the world’s market. If money moves out of US stocks and towards other stocks, you still capture the move and aren’t worse off. You do loose if money moves out of publicly traded stocks and into other asset classes, though.

Part of the idea behind long term investing in stocks is that over the longer run, money that moves out of publicly traded stocks should regain confidence in them and get back in (another, maybe more convincing part, is that stocks represent ownership of productive companies whose value should go up in time as they produce more things/services).

The reasoning is different if you believe some markets represent other risks that can’t be accurately compensated for (like your assets being seized), in which case, “VT and chill” is probably not the right approach indeed. For full disclosure, I’d be in Dev ex-US myself, right now (though I don’t have investable money so am instead a lucky bast*rd sitting on the sidelines).

1 Like