Chronicles of 2025

I am not saying it would not affect us
I am just saying this will be least of our issues

US market has 1.5% dividend yield. 20% extra WHt means 0.30% drag on returns for US exposure

But if such a law comes into play, this will reduce confidence of foreign investors in US markets (leading to capital outflows) and hence the drop in stock prices could be more painful than 0.3% tax loss. If you constantly need to worry about getting your money taken away by random laws, you might seek peace of mind rather than 0.30% extra dividend.

Who is to guarantee that capital gains tax won’t come next ?

We need to remember that US market is (was) interesting because it’s open and transparent and have respect to rule of law. If none of this exists, then it’s nothing different than other complicated markets like China. Eventually Return OF capital is more important than Return On Capital.

I really hope rule of law continues to exist once dust settles . I have significant exposure to US myself and I like US companies.

3 Likes

The tax return is limited by your average tax rate, and if you aren‘t earning many 100K your average tax rate will be a lot lower than the proposed extra ~30% on top of the 15% rate. So you‘ll lose out on a lot of withholding tax, that can‘t be credited.

On the topic of US tariffs - an interview from Wei Li (blackrock) is very informative and interesting on Bloomberg

She seems very clear in her thinking
I saw it on Bloomberg live so can’t post the link

She is US overweight in her strategy.

Can you please elaborate or point me to somewhere I can test it myself? Ie how it’d change if one earns 100k, 200k, 300k?

Does she give a reasoning for it?

Edit: my own reasoning for looking to overweigh my US exposure more is that I believe that once the scheisse is over we’ll have a US mega bull run, so enduring the next years while accumulating will pay off handsomely.

This also assumes that the extra tax would be recoverable (personally I don’t think it would).

1 Like

Many developed countries don’t charge any withholding tax. Isn’t 15% already bad? Also, aren’t there a country we all know that already charges the ridiculously high 35% withholding tax? Actually, that may be the main reason why we aren’t at a double-digit percentage of ACWI, who knows


1 Like

I don’t think Switzerland charges 35% to countries which have DTAA.

Are you sure?

Agree. There is no way for it to be recoverable because extra tax is not part of DTAA. It’s random tax which is unilaterally applied.

Country with less than 10 million (0.1% of world) people and no natural resources is accounting for more than 2% of ACWI. It’s already a major achievement.

I think Switzerland accounts for a higher market cap per capita than US in ACWI.

Actually it seems for US investor portfolio they were already overweight

But her main comments were about short term & not much will happen because supply chain takes very long time to change and hence practical solutions would be found. So she is not very worried. She also said that US bond yields are rising due to US debt and term premium need to be established back to 1-1.5% levels . This shouldn’t be seen as world Mistrust in US

She said for term the risks are unknown and uncertain.

Here is the video

Interview is in beginning (see thumbnail)

I just understood that this tax is also for bond interest etc and not just for dividends

20% on interest from treasury bills or bonds could be a huge problem for central banks, institutions etc. Because high portion of Bond returns are linked to coupons

Not sure if pension funds would be exempt or not

1 Like

Trump would probably send her to BTC land if she was unAmerican is the likely reason she’s saying that :wink:

Just the normal income tax calculator Cookie Not accepted

It gives you an average tax at the end. And average tax is the max you can claim back with DA-1.

1 Like

Or just look your actual tax bill from 2024 and divide it by net taxable come . That’s your average tax

@Mirager

1 Like

Seems Switzerland has indefinitely delayed UTPR already. I wasn’t aware

1 Like

Looks like someone coined another acronym to address this point.

move over TACO, here is FAFO (Fuss Around and Find Out):

I found their (Blackrock) assumptions , here they are when measured in CHF
Source

Over 20 year period - CH, US & EUR have similar returns (pre taxes) for Equities. But it seems they are bullish on Emerging markets

2 Likes

okay, I’m confused, for 20 years: europe large cap=6.3, USA large cap=5.9%. Why is Global ex Switzerland large cap only 4.7%. Are Japan/Canada/Australia and other smaller components pulling down the result that much?

1 Like

Europe includes CH.
DM ex CH will be US, Canada, Europe ex CH and Pacific

I think your assumption is right that other regions might have a lower return expected

Allianz estimates 10% market sell off, 0.5% yield rise & 5% USD drop if section 899 as approved by US congress becomes a law after Senate approval. Reason being this law gives random power to the US treasury to weaponise capital markets

As per them, market is currently not pricing this section to become a law.

3 Likes