I have no idea but I presume that the 30% will be used to deduct your tax liability when you file your taxes, so in the long run you’ll get the money back.
(But I’m not sure about the points I raised here so feel free to jump in and correct me if anyone knows better)
So after some digging I think I know what happened.
As Guillaume has stated, exactly 15% have been deducted from the dividends.
What has thrown of my calculation was that I bough some VT on the 20.12. For those shares I did not receive any dividend as they have been probably bought too close to the dividend date.
Is it correct to assume that I then have paid the (share price - dividend amount)? Otherwise it would feel a bit weird to pay full price and then not receive the dividend.
The share price should theoretically drop by the dividend amount on the ex-dividend date to account for the fact that the buyer will not receive the dividends. So no, it shouldn’t matter (in fact it should be slightly better for you to buy after the dividend date, since you get taxed on the dividend, but IMO it’s too small an advantage to worry about)
In practice you probably won’t notice this price change since it is not unusual for the price to vary more than a typical dividend for VT
Share price dropped from 105.10$ to 103.36$ on 20th December (ex dividend day). Dividend was 0.78$/share. So you were better off by 0.96$/share pre taxes and ~1.16$/share after taxes.
I’d just add that IB has very good reporting tools. In web client: Reports → Statements → Activity → Year To Date
You can see a ton of stuff there, including Trades, Dividends (with all dates), Withholding Tax, Change in Dividend Accruals (showing pending dividends yet to be paid to you)…
Durch das Lesen und die Teilnahme an diesem Forum bestätigst du, dass du den auf http://www.mustachianpost.com/de/ dargestellten Haftungsausschluss gelesen hast und damit einverstanden bist.