The rates are OK for me. I will strongly consider VIAC when my fix rate ends.
Now that I’m rereading their email to be sure, they didn’t specify the type of VIAC portfolio. In the end, I went with another bank, so I didn’t go further with their process.
at the time of application, did you have pillar 3 or Invest or both at VIAC?
These rates aren’t competitive on their own. They might only be worthwhile when bundled with a fully invested Pillar 3a. To know for sure, you’d need to calculate whether a higher VIAC rate plus strong 3a returns actually outweighs a lower mortgage rate paired with a weaker 3a setup. For reference, current top benchmark rates are 1.10–1.20% for 10 years and 0.95–1.05% for 5 years.
I plan to FIRE in a couple of years. So VIAC mortgage can help make use of part of the VB funds to reduce amount tied up in home equity.
I could transfer PF into VIAC VB and use this to refinance my home loan and release funds.
The released funds can be used to pay off rental mortgages which have a higher interest rate than owner occupied mortgages.
Both, but the Invest part is really small and was not mentioned in the form I filled out to get the mortgage offer. I only started it recently as a convenient way to build up invested capital for the kids.
Don’t all banks offer passive 3a funds by now? They aren’t as cheap as VIAC or Finpension, but usually in the 0.6-0.9% TER range?
I assume most people will have a mortgage that is 10x bigger than their 3a accounts. Thus a 0.10% better Saron rate probably dwarfs the higher TER.
0.1% difference on SARON on 1m CHF loan is equivalent to 1% (additional cost and/or expected return difference) on a 100k Pillar 3 account. Over time, Pillar 3 a grows both with indirect amortization (14.5 k CHF for 2 borrowers) and growth of the portfolio itself.
So while 0.85% SARON rate isn’t the best, but a hypothetical 0.75% SARON at a bank (with decent passive pillar 3a) doesn’t necessarily beat it over next 5-10 years timeframe). It is more of a tie.
I also matters how much HARD CASH downpayment (excluding pillar 3 / pillar 2 pledge) are banks insisting on. The ones I talked to are asking 10% hard cash. Avoiding that would make bigger difference: either way with VIAC or some good negotiation skills (that I don’t necessarily possess)
So what if you have 0.1% less on the mortgage and 0.2% more on an equivalent 3a? You save more on the mortgage than you pay on the 3a, don’t you?
Assuming equivalent 3a (which it isn’t), and 0.2% cost difference, an equivalent LTV bank offering will start out cheaper and stays so for 5-10 years.
The cheapest non-VIAC/Finpension 3a I found is ZKB. the others (Raiffeisen, CA-NextBank, UBS, etc) cost between 0.69-0.9% and are ~30-40% CH equity and ~70% portfolio CHF hedged, etc. etc.
As I wrote above, the hard cash downpayment requirement will likely be a bigger differentiator.
Sounds totally logic the new rules with 60% asset value for pledging.
Anyone has already finished a 3y SARON period? I guess they make a new offer with 0,85% margin rate. Do they ask for any updated documents?
9 posts were merged into an existing topic: Finpension potential mortgage offering