Long story short: Due to horrible circumstances my friend inherited a portfolio of individual stocks in excess of multiple 100k’s. I was asked to come look over the info after he met with the families private banker at a cantonal bank since he knows I’m interested in investing.
I am a boglehead (I think, never read the book, but I subscribe to the philosophy) so my investment strategy is: diversify and keep costs down. So I have everything invested in VT through IB (after careful studying various sources, among them this board).
My jaw dropped when I saw the conditions they charge:
- 0.65% of the invested sum for “wealth advice”, if you let them invest for you (basically they do everything) it’s 0.95%
- if you wish to invest yourself without their advice the cost of the E-Depot is 0.25% (minimum 50 CHF per year)
- buying the commission 0.4% for swiss stocks and 0.5% for foreign markets (minimum 40 CHF, max. 1000 CHF) which doesn’t include fx-commisions.
The portfolio they’ve put together with the deceased is pretty much all the firms of the SMI minus the finance ones with some firms way overrepresented compared to the SMI and others underrepresented (76% of the portfolio is in the SMI). A little over 20% is iShares SMI ETF, SMIM ETF and EuroStoxx ETF. It seems to be mostly firms with higher dividends like Roche and similar ones. For my calculation the yearly dividend (based on the banks forecasting for this year) is about 4.5%.
The cumulative net performance over the past 10 years was 43% (since they wrote net I assume it’s after they take their share) compared to for example iShares SMI which was 102.21% (I assume it’s before TER)!!! The yearly net performance was 3.58% (again, assuming after they took their share). My jaw dropped again because they apparently said it was a great performance over the past 10 years! To be fair, what else would they say in that situation…
The yearly dividends are somewhat attractive to my friend since they’ll be much more than just investing in SMI or VT. And because the stocks is “all” he got at this moment it’s a substantial yearly amount. But considering the cost associated with with the trading “platform” and their meager performance I’m trying to convince my friend of other options, mainly ETF considering he’s got a investment horizon of 20+ years.
A couple questions that did come to me looking over everything again:
- I’m not sure what other investments the deceased had, maybe that decreased the cost substantially. But if not the banks are pretty much commiting highway robbery at 0.65% - 0.95% + commisions on trades!
- About 7.5% of the portfolio is invested in iShares ETF SMI… Why would they do that when most of the portfolio is in the SMI anyways? To smoothen the volatility of the portfolio?
I just thought it’s interesting