Mortgage rates in Switzerland [2025 edition]

Hi all,

We recently closed on our apartment purchase and couldn’t be happier! As promised, I’m sharing our experience obtaining a mortgage with Swissquote/LUKB.

TLDR version: SQ/LUKB offer one of the most competitive and accessible SARON mortgages in Switzerland for existing property. I was able to secure their advertised rate/margin (margin is 0.55% but stated as 0.75% on their website, which includes the current SARON rate). The process was quite straightforward (though took some time), completely online, no negotiations, and no asset transfers nor insurance required.

Key info: Property located in Canton Vaud, purchase price around CHF 1M, LTV at 80%, deposit (20%) paid in cash, no pledging or withdrawal of pillar 2/3a. Annual amortization of 10K for 15 years, through mix of indirect (maximum) and direct for the remainder. Indirect amortization only possible through LUKB 3a savings account. Both borrowers are first-time buyers, non-Swiss.

We started the process of looking for a mortgage provider in January. Our strategy was to directly contact local cantonal banks (BCGE, BCV), as well as engage Moneypark to cover all the institutions that we weren’t aware of or didn’t have the time to contact ourselves. Funnily enough, I only found out about the Swissquote mortgage through a social media ad after I’d been googling “best mortgage Switzerland” for a few days (I guess that’s one reason to be thankful for targeted marketing).

I browsed their site and saw their advertised rate of 0.99% at the time, which I thought was average at best. I assumed it was their margin and they would add the SARON rate on top of that. I decided to go and apply anyway just to have more options so I opened a Swissquote account (required). Downloaded their app, completed a form, and transferred a small amount (not sure this last step is necessary, but I also wanted to explore their trading platform). I then started the actual mortgage application where I answered the usual questions and after a few minutes, I received a mortgage feasibility analysis (only available in German) saying that everything looked good and that I should upload all the documents to a secure link they provided.

Fairly smooth process to upload everything, got an email back from an SQ rep after 2 working days as advertised. SQ rep also included a table of rates offered in their email, and this is where I saw that 0.99% for a 3-year SARON mortgage already included the SARON rate (0.44% back then), while separately and explicitly stating that their margin was only 0.55% ! I called and was able to speak to them on the phone to confirm the rate and clarify something about one of the documents requested - they were nice, confirmed the margin, figured out what was needed, then told me they’ll evaluate and get back to me.

This is the point where we of course got really excited. We wanted to know more about SQ/LUKB but couldn’t find anything online (no articles, reviews, etc.) I even searched in forums and in different languages but it’s mostly about their trading/banking business. So after that initial euphoria of thinking we found a great deal, we felt deflated when we couldn’t find a single (success) story about them. I was thinking maybe this is just a hook to lure people in, where in the end they’d offer a higher rate or require so many things that would make the mortgage unattractive.

Anyway, back to the story. It was around this time that we received our first offers from the cantonal banks and met with our Moneypark advisor. The first (and only) offer from Moneypark was with UBS at 0.95% margin. Cantonal banks were even higher so we put their offers aside and focused on trying to negotiate with the others first.

I followed up with SQ rep the following week both through email and phone but they weren’t answering. Tried again the week after without success. Finally heard back three weeks after the completed submission with a short email saying they were still evaluating. At this point we weren’t hopeful anything would come out of it since they were not responsive at all. Contrast that with Moneypark agent, who improved slightly on their offer, was very responsive and was ready to proceed with the agreement. But good thing we had some time before the purchase could be completed - we had to wait for some paperwork from the previous owners to come through before the sale/transfer date could be finalized.

Two weeks after that (Week 5), I got another email from SQ rep saying that LUKB colleagues were now handling the assessment. Then another three weeks went by (Week 8) when out of the blue we received a binding offer from LUKB sent through the SQ app! We were just about ready to accept the UBS offer but we held off to check if the SQ/LUKB offer was legit!

Just to note that during those 8 weeks, I was following up multiple times each week both through email and phone, but didn’t get any response at all except for the emails mentioned. As you can imagine, our initial hope had already turned to resignation as we prepared to settle for the Moneypark/UBS offer.

But I am really happy to report that the wait and anxiety was worth it - margin offered (0.55%) was exactly as first quoted, no negotiating, no need for any asset transfer, and no unemployment/disability/life insurance required. The only downside (if you can even call it that) is that there is no option to do indirect amortization with a 3a investment account. We happily accepted their offer.

We were then shifted to interacting with an LUKB email address (previous interactions were all with SQ rep). From this point on, we found the LUKB team were quite responsive to questions or updates with the process and engaging with our notary. All completely through email - they don’t even have a phone number we could call. We received physical copies of the contract and other documents 2 weeks after accepting the offer, signed and sent them back by mail, and voila! Completed the purchase a further 2 weeks after that (12 weeks in total).

The SQ/LUKB mortgage is a very underrated option IMHO. I’m very surprised that they are not more well-known, or even talked about in this space - I would even rate them better than VIAC/WIR (perhaps MP should feature them). I assume it’s a combination of how people misinterpret their advertised SARON rates, needing to open a Swissquote account first before applying / getting clarity on those rates, and lack of other people already talking about them.

I would highly recommend them for those buying or refinancing existing property. From my experience, it would be best to start engaging with them a minimum of 3 months before the targeted sale/transfer/refinance date. We also really liked that there was no room/need for negotiation of the rates or anything else - as first-time buyers, we were not confident we’d have any leverage to negotiate down any offers.

I also think it is one of the most accessible mortgages, and I mean that in the sense that we didn’t need to be employees of the lender or have a low LTV to get that rate. While we do have more income and assets than the bare minimum required by affordability tests, I’d consider us to only have an average profile. Not having a previously established relationship with them wasn’t a factor either.

Possible downsides for some: they don’t consider new builds / homes under construction, they finance only up to 80% LTV and you must have at least 10% in “hard” cash, they only allow indirect amortization through low interest 3a savings account, and I am not sure they have the processing capacity if you have a short time frame in mind for your transaction. But if those conditions are not an issue for you, then this is one of the best offers out there.

Hoping this information is helpful for someone, the same way that this forum has been invaluable for me in my financial journey!

13 Likes

congratulations on your mortgage!
while doing my research I also found them to be the best for SARON margin but since they were not accepting new builds, I had to go with VIAC and settle for a 0.65% margin.

but you said, there is no option to do indirect amortization via any investment vehicles? I thought this was possible via LUKB and they had some decent funds (not as cheap as VIAC but definitely better than UBS)

1 Like

Nice find and thanks for all the details - we would also not be eligible, but good to know for refinancing.
Can confirm VIAC is at 0.65%, so their offer is indeed better.

If someone here wants to do the math how much that 0.1% interest difference counts, vs. being able to invest the indirect amortization in VIAC, we may find the “best” answer :slight_smile:

2 Likes

They specify that only the savings 3a account can be used for indirect amortization. I guess this is a restriction for this particular mortgage type and rate.

Maybe they allow 3a investment into some funds if you get their traditional mortgage, but then rates and conditions will be different I assume.

Yes I agree, I’d have seriously considered VIAC if it were an option for us (non B/C permit holders so not qualified with VIAC outright).

FWIW I did do some comparisons - for an 800K mortgage, and assuming you invest the 0.1% difference (in this case 800 per year) with the same yield, VIAC would come out ahead if your net return was at least 2% per year for the 15 year period. If you can achieve 5%, then VIAC would be 28K ahead.

Given that, I think VIAC is of course a great option (and probably better for most), depending on the investment strategy you choose and its performance. But at this point we are already exposed to global equity and bonds through our other investments. For us, the possible opportunity cost from not being able to “fully” invest the 3a funds is acceptable, considering that it lowers risk linked to our mortgage.

It’s just puzzling to me why SQ/LUKB isn’t getting more buzz when they should be right up there in discussions for the best mortgage in Switzerland.

Please feel free to correct me if the calculations don’t add up! Always happy to learn :slight_smile:

1 Like

Any ideas why they don’t do new builds?
Construction loans I understand, and many don’t, but I’m not sure I see the difference for a mortgage between a new build or not.

I did some simulations comparing two 3a 100 % equity solutions over 15 years for my situation.
I can confirm that even a better return on the 3rd pillar can justify a substantially higher mortgage interest rate. Over the long run, compounding return on an equity 3a wipes out a higher mortgage interest rate.

Being able to do amortisation only over a 3a savings account would be a deal breaker for me. But I see that in your case it was a good option.

It’s more risky. You never truly know the final price of a new build until it is completely done and the final bill is in. There is also a risk that some subcontracting turns truly horrible, with the hired company not paying the bills of the subcontractors and going into bankruptcy, in which case you can end up having to pay things twice (the hired company AND the subcontractors).

Properly evaluating the risk, and handling the construction loan that should be slowly depleted during the works and turned into a mortgage at the end takes time and involves risk that may require a higher margin on the bank part and not work with their model.

Makes sense for people that are transitioning from a construction loan, but if you’re buying from a developer, isn’t the price fixed and the risk with them?

To me it seems as if, in a new building, by the time you need the loan to be payed out, the apartment is already done and not in construction anymore. But that’s my interpretation of it.

One question I have is, what does it means “term” in a SARON mortgage? UBS advertises unlimited term while others (like SQ) have 1 or 3 years term for SARON. Does it means that after the term finishes, we need to apply again for a new SARON mortgage for another 3 years, with a new evaluation of the credit, and possibly a new margin? Which will not happen with UBS since they have unlimited term? So, in principle, SQ can offer now a margin 0.55% and in 3 years they can increase it to whatever, like 1%, which will then be higher than 0.95% UBS unlimited. I’m just trying to make sense of one bank offering almost half the margin that other. Is there a catch?

There are 2 types of financing in a promotion project:

  • You either pay a lumpsum at the start (usually 20%) and the rest at delivery. In this case the promoter will support the financing risk and will usually take a loan with a bank to finance the construction
  • You pay in stages at defined milestones of the project and in this case you will need a credit line from a bank as you will run out of capital as funds are called

In the first case indeed you only need the mortgage at the end when the project is finished

2 Likes

The mortgage limit is separate from the credit product under it. Your credit worthiness will be reviewed at some point even if the credit product has no maturity date on it. A 0.95% margin on a SARON is crap so there’s no point to accept those terms even if the margin is not to be changed in the future, actually the bank will be happy to sell this to you as a plus when in fact you are signing to be milked.

SNB cut today. We’re at zero rates.

7 Likes

I was asking myself this exact scenario before. Basically, the “term” just guarantees the margin for that period if your financial picture remains stable, but as @HoiZame explained, this is separate from creditworthiness checks which will happen anyway. So I imagine that even though the UBS term is “unlimited”, if they do a credit check and your circumstances have worsened, then they can require additional equity and/or change (increase) their offered rates anyway. If their initial rate is high, it’s really not worth it to choose their offer even if it is marketed as “unlimited”.

For SQ renewal, I imagine that if you’re an existing client, you’d have another “check” when it’s time for that but it won’t be as thorough. As for the possible scenario of SQ jacking up the margin, well then I’d just shop around the market when the time comes. Or convert to fixed before that, if advantageous.

But I think I’ll be sticking to SARON for the forseeable future :star_struck:: Swiss National Bank lowers SNB policy rate to 0%

2 Likes

Only in Switzerland, rates are set to zero without any recession or bad economic situation :slight_smile:

How long does it take now for the mortgage rates to decrease?

Given it was the general consensus, rates won’t decrease much based on the news. Maybe the really short-term ones a bit.
Longer-term rates are much more impacted by the current geo-political situation for instance.

Otherwise to answer you question, it will depend on the bank, but a week or so, so probably starting next week?

2 Likes

Looks like post the SNB announcement the fixed rates are trending upwards, possibly due to the Israel-Iran situation.

Have 2 options on the table (planning a 50:50 5y and SARON split)

  1. Cantonal bank - 5y at 1.14% and SARON (3 year framework) margin of 0.89%
  2. M Bank - 5y at 1.07% and SARON (no framework) margin of 0.87%

Got it from cantonal bank today and M bank sent it more than a week back; hope they still keep those rates. Need to take a final call this week o have enough time to have everything in place for the notary.

People above reported better SARON margins (sadly my bank raised mine and I am very close to your offers now).

Yes, the SNB seem quite proactive. Makes a big difference from the Fed who will be watching the horse running around in the field to make sure the data shows that it has really bolted before shutting the stable doors.