Look at it long-term, it’s like the stock market. There will be years which are painful, but in the end you’ll end up with more money. Historically (last 40 years) 5-10 years mortgages did cost you 1%/year more than having a variable mortgage (Saron these days).
If your risk appetite allows it, you can stay with Saron long-term and it will (should) be worth it.
Fair enough, but that’s for short vs. long term in general.
Several people seem to be set on fixed, and just wonder about the timing. What I’m trying to add is that this might go either way. It’s not a no brainer.
If it were, it would already be reflected in the rates.
The decision is personal as it depends on risk tolerance, capacity to pay higher interest, positioning within the portfolio and timing.
When I fixed my home mortgage, I had the choice of SARON+0.65% or 10 year fix at 0.75%. For me it was a no-brainer to take the fix.
I recently took a 10 year fix on another property at 1.49%. Although interest rates are falling and I could potentially secure a lower rate by waiting for rates to fall, I really didn’t want to take the risk. Even if the trajectory is lower, there are always the unknown unknowns which can throw a spanner in the works.
By fixing now, I also have my mortgages overlapping at 5 year intervals. In 3 years, I’ll start to look at whether it makes sense to fix the first mortgage when it comes up for renewal in 5 years time.
I think it will still go down slightly. For instance, VIAC are adjusting their rate every Thursday and today they updated the 5 years fixed rate to 1.06% (vs 1.18% last week) and the 10y to 1.23% (vs 1.36% last week), while the SWAP rate went up this week.
What‘s the matter? Why are you digging up such an old comment? Where did I mock you?
I don‘t even know what comment here is refered to, as I can‘t see to where it‘s answered.
I tried to find your comment earlier up, but could not find one.
Not sure why you‘re being passive agressive here, and I‘ve given plenty of thoughtful input in the topic since. You are free to read it.
Your comment sounds like you are being needlessly petty.
I think I‘ve shown to be a productive discussion member of the forum since then and not trying to needlessly stir up unproductive discussion.
Granted my comment from back then seems like unneccessary also, and I likely wouldn‘t post it again.
I’m not sure if the bit you quoted was the mocking you referred to, but it doesn’t need to be read like that. I’m part of other forums where comments are made which are quickly overtaken by events and phrases like ‘this aged like milk’ are used not to mock, but to remark on the rapidly shifting circumstances.
Online it can be hard to gauge someone’s meaning and intent, so I find it better to interpret comments charitably even if one can initially bristle at the comments made.
Mit dem Lesen und der Teilnahme an diesem Forum bestätigst du, dass du die Forum-Richtlinien gelesen hast und damit einverstanden bist sowie den Haftungsausschluss auf http://www.mustachianpost.com/de/ akzeptierst.