Makes no sense to me. How would it reduce wealth tax or income tax? It would only increase leverage.
2 Likes
I guess income because you (currently still) can deduct the interests? (but yeah it seems unrelated to paying taxes, it’s just increasing leverage)
1 Like
Debt (margin loan) can be deducted from wealth and interest can be deducted from income plus the amount of taxes you would have to pay will appreciate by 7% on average every year (when invested in broad index funds).
If you sell to pay for the taxes, your wealth is exactly the same as in the loan case. The loan doesn’t affect wealth (you get equal assets and liabilities).
If you’re interested in spending 10’000 to save 3’000 in income taxes, you could as well donate to charity. You aren’t up 3’000, you’re down 7’000.
You’re right that you might make higher returns. That’s the effect of leverage. But negative returns are also amplified…
2 Likes
I think money paid to the tax authorities (and sitting on that account until the tax is due) does not count towards your wealth, even if you paid too much and receive parts back later. At least recall to have read that somewhere. The impact on taxes is probably tiny but could be considered I guess.
The thread theme is Lombard loan, is it worth it.
The answer is yes, but only if you don’t need it. And if you don’t need it you are actually better off with a loan, no matter what you use as a collateral.
I have some strange ideas about money: it is a practical thing for exchanging goods; not so much for storing value. Now I do not only use loans for tax and to buy stocks, but for more or less everything I spend during a year or two. All my cash accounts are hedged with debt.
Money is very practical, allows you to do a lot of things. But it has a state guarantee to lose value. So what I do is I always keep at least the amount of all my cash accounts in all currencies that I use as debt.
That way inflation works for me: my debt loses in value, probably more than my cash does (because it is more).
3 Likes
There were a few recent years where cash was pretty good tho (negative interest rate and zero or negative inflation). Though yes when rates are positive, in general cash is bad (you want at minimum the risk free rate, eg short term sovereign bonds/MMFs).
Isn’t the loan interest always higher than inflation?
At least it should be, yes. But then you have to compare what your money does. Of course I have cash accounts in various currencies for about a year or two because I want to stay liquid all the time. That is nonsense. To finance it with debt is another story because the alternative would be to sell stocks. And me needing money is a very bad reason for selling a stock. I want to be invested all the time at least 100%.
That said I compare inflation plus dividends plus median price appreciation to interest. Then it is a no-brainer.