How do you internalize books? You make notes? Deliberate practice? I’m asking seriously, as I tend to read a lot, but I’m unable to memorize anything that I read for longer than a week.
Talk to others about what you read is the best way for me to sort out thoughts and really understand, not just read, books.
This is a very important question! My answer will be quite long, sorry about that.
I read a lot of books (way too much, according to @ma0), both because I enjoy it, and because I am curious about how things work. But as you rightly said, there comes a point where you figure out that you forgot more than 80% of what you have read (and I may be underestimating it). This is quite a sour taste: what’s the point of reading non-fiction, if you won’t remember any of it? All this time spent reading has been wasted (except for the possible enjoyment you had while reading).
Note: I am only talking about non-fiction books here. Fictions are a strongly different category, where the focus is enjoyment, and also possibly to get a glimpse on human nature).
So I decided I needed a way to remember what I read. Here is what I came up with:
1. The Feynman Technique
First, before remembering something/internalizing it, you should be able to understand it. In many cases, it is way harder than it seems. How many times did I try to talk to a friend about something I was reading, only to realize that I was not able to explain it in simple terms (i.e, I don’t really understand it)? Needless to say that if you don’t understand something, you won’t be able to internalize it in a useful way (or even worse, you may base future knowledge on it, without realizing that your assumption is shaky).
The most efficient way to check if I understand something is to use the following technique devised by Richard Feynman:
- Choose a concept you want to learn about
- Pretend you are teaching it to a student in grade 6 (i.e, a young student, reasonably intelligent, but who does not know advanced concepts).
- Identify gaps in your explanation; Go back to the source material, to better understand it.
- Rinse and Repeat.
2. Semantic Tree / Latticework of Mental Models
The second fundamental principle is that you will never be able to remember isolated facts. Do you remember when you were a student and you learned a lot of stuffs just before an exam, only to forget it once the exam was over? You don’t want to do that again. This works to get credentials, but it does not build useful knowledge.
Enter Charlie Munger and Elon Musk:
it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree — make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to. - Elon Musk
You’ve got to have models in your head. And you’ve got to array your experience ‑ both vicarious and direct ‑ on this latticework of models. You may have noticed students who just try to remember and pound back what is remembered. Well, they fail in school and in life. You’ve got to hang experience on a latticework of models in your head - Charlie Munger
You get the idea: before reading about anything, it is important to ask if you already know the big ideas about the topic the book is about. Ideally what you want to do is to pick the big disciplines, and to learn and master the fundamental principles about each discipline.
If you want to read about biology, read Darwin first. Economics? Start with Adam Smith, and go from there. Those will be the “trunk” of your semantic tree - the basics on which you can attach everything else. I noticed that I remember a lot of things if I do it in this way.
But it is not enough to know principles, you need also to see how they interact between them, and how to make a synthesis. I’ll give examples below.
In real life, I take a lot of notes. Plain, simple, markdown text files which I organize using Obsidian (there are other cool similar softwares, like Roam for instance. The important feature is that Obsidian allows you to make links between notes, and also to see all the notes linking to the current link.
This way, you quickly realize that the notes that are linked a lot form the principal branches of your knowledge tree. Almost all your existing knowledge is based on them, so you’d better get them right.
Here is a snapshot of the graph of my notes:
The big nodes with a lot of links are currently about Investing (especially the study of competitive advantages), Biology and Psychology.
Here is how I proceed:
For instance, let’s say I want to read about biology. I start with the basics: one of the fundamental principles of biology is evolution and natural selection, so I will write the following note:
Then a bit later, I will learn about the Red Queen Effect, which derives from evolution, so I may write the following note, linked to the first one:
Then later, when I read about investing, I realize that I can find similar effects not only in biology , but also in business. For instance, I wrote here about how Swiss providers of 3a third pillars are in effect commodity businesses. Each provider will try to improve its offer. They will reinvest all of their profits in a new platform, or in digital offering, or whatever, but at the end the important factor is the price, which means that on a net business basis all their efforts will neutralize each other : they will have spent a lot of capital just to stay at the same competitive place: the profits of the new offerings do not accrue to their bottom line, but to the customer advantage.
So i write a third note, with two links; one toward the Red Queen effect, and another one toward commodity businesses (in the investing section). This is an example of how you can do a ssynthesis between disciplines. Every time you do that, your latticework of mental models get bigger and stronger, and you will remember stuffs better.
This also implies that you should choose your books carefuly: start with the fundamentals, master them. When you get a new book, figure out quickly if is going to build upon you knowledge. Sometimes, you will find texts that will shake your assumptions: this is quite important because you need to figure out if the author is right: if he is, you need to adjust your tree. If he is wrong, just ditch the book, it is not worth it.
Another thing: you don’t want to read all the books on earth. You want to read and re-read the best ones. So figure out what the best ones are
Maybe we could open a book club here where we read chapters and discuss them.
Depends a lot about what kind of book it is and what you want to learn. I’ll add to the excellent recommendations above:
There is quite a good evidence base that spaced repetition is an efficient way to gain certain types of knowledge (a meta-study about this as an example).
It seem that spaced repetition is especially usefull for memorizing “facts”. This might make you dismiss its value, but I believe that factual knowledge often builds the basis for more complex learning. And there is some evidence that spaced repetition is also useful for learning more complex topics, such as maths.
Luckily for us, there are apps like anki that use simple algorithms to determine spacing and to make the repetition more efficient for learning.
(Having to condense a book into anki cards is in itself a great exercise in distilling the relevant information. Similair to how the feynman technique works, I suppose.)
I think a lot of books have one or just a few statements and the rest of the content tries to proof the thesis or is just fluff content.
For me it’s usually enough that I understand and remember the thesis. If I need the details I can look it up.
For example the last book I read was “Kaufen oder mieten” (buy or rent).
I remember the main thesis that real estate has been a worse investment than a diversified stock portfolio most of the time.
I also remember a few arguments like lack of diversification, home owners are forced to save and stock investors need more discipline, …
Maybe I forgot 90% of the book, but I think I got the message and don’t take for granted that rent is wasted money (like most people I know do).
There‘s also Services like getAbstract that provide summaries.
I’d be possibly in, if the book interest me
Speaking of books, can anyone recommend some good ebook reader? bonus points if it has some backlight to read in bed.
The Kindle Paperwhite is a classic, and it works perfectly for me. It has a long battery life, responsive, and you can either buy books from Amazon or load them via USB.
There’s also a convenient feature where you can email documents & articles to a special address and they’ll be auto-converted and sent to the Kindle.
My best ebook reader so far
+1 for Kindle
I own one of the pre-touch screen ones and love it. Have also tried paperwhite for a while and was also satisfied with it
i use getAbstract… but concepts go away even faster! Do you have a good experience with it?
I similarly enjoy the Kindle Voyage if you can get your hands on one (it’s been retired but is still fairly easy to get).