In the summary linked above I don’t see any changes impacting your wife’s situation.
The obligation to disclose compensation received from insurance companies or other third parties is a first step towards more transparency, but unfortunately not enough. While potential prospects may flare the scam seeing large kickbacks, two digits compensation may not seem that high considering those contracts are often signed for 30+ years. Additionally, it does not bring more transparency to contracts sold directly by the insurance companies.
Where we need more transparency imho is how much of the premiums are allocated towards the insurance and capital accrued components. Only then prospects may notice that the premiums paid for the insurance component are really high compared to a standalone contract outside of 3a.