In 99.9% of those cases, people who got rejected claimed the supplemental US withholding (so they’re asking for a 30% refund instead of 15%).
You probably need to amend your declaration and only ask for DA-1, not R-US.
In 99.9% of those cases, people who got rejected claimed the supplemental US withholding (so they’re asking for a 30% refund instead of 15%).
You probably need to amend your declaration and only ask for DA-1, not R-US.
I just spoke with the person in charge of my declaration. She is reaffirming that I asked correctly for the foreign witholded taxes. I will receive a refund of a 15% for those assets that are eligible of a refund BUT no refund at all for VT because it is an US-Asset and IB is based in the UK… this does make no sense at all to me because all my assets are deposited together in IB and therefore in the UK and I don’t see why it shold be differen for US-Assets but she explicitly confirmed this are the rules…
If this does not make sense to you either, what would you do in my position? Thanks
So just to be sure.
You received dividends of lets say 800 USD from VT. IB deducted 15% 120 USD because you had W8BEN filled in already
Now when you asked for 120 USD refund via DA1 form, the tax office rejected the claim because IB is in UK? The tax is not about brokerage, the tax is about security. Your security is in USA , so it shouldn’t matter if your broker is in UK or Uk or wherever outside CH.
This is very strange.
Sometime back someone else also mentioned the case for canton Schwyz. I am starting to think there is someone going on.
Where your broker is located doesn’t matter at all. VT is an US-Based ETF so with the Double Tax Treaty CH-US you can claim all the WHT.
Your tax officer is just incompetent and this is usual. To have study their training formation they don’t have any clue of what they are doing, they just do it mechanically and don’t ask their legal division about “tiny” problem like yours.
Ask her to have your tax declaration analysed by their legal division.
I willhave to send a formal request to revise the case, I guess.
To clarify, are those other assets at IB as well? Are they US domiciled assets?
(and you double checked your declaration? it doesn’t say depot schweiz or zusätzliche Steuerrückbehalt USA anywhere?
Not trying to be pedantic, but it simply may help when discussing this topic (with anybody, this forum, colleagues, tax officer), this US WHT withheld by IB (or a part thereof) is credited (aka Gutschrift) to you on your tax bill, and not refunded.
The “Zusätzlicher Steuerrückbehalt US Aktien” (withheld by Swiss brokers) is refunded.
This is why some people may think you are speaking of the latter, when you speak of a refund.
Thanks everybody for your answers and informations. As I said, I know very little about fiscality issues like these and I may be confusing some terms. Therefore I just had a deeper look. In Graubünden, besides of the bill regarding my income tax, I receive every year three different documents from regarding my assets declaration:
Every year I received a small refund (credit?) in every one of the documents. This year the situation is as follows:
I double checked on my tax declaration. No mention about “depot Schweiz” or anything similar.
Then it seems to me like everything is in order. As 2. is not being withheld by IB due to W8-BEN. So nothing to be able to be refunded.
Okay
So you were trying to get 30% back instead of 15%
Tax office declined
All good
Next time, please fill the form correctly.
Wow, I must say this sounds like arabic to me I am happy to know I can trust my tax officers
@Abs_max would you be so kind to explain to me what I did wrong? I still dont’ get it.. thanks for your patience!
Tax office in switzerland is in general the most friendly office i know of in the world.
It it tough to say for your canton. But for Zurich, when I enter the security in tax software, I get this question.
This assumes you filled in WE8BN at your brokers in time.
Reason is that foreign brokers with correct W8BEN forms only deduct 15% from dividends. Swiss brokers are obliged to deduct additional 15% (+15% of withholding in US)
Thanks so much for this explanation. I think I get it now!
In Graubünden they are all very kind but the software gives a little less informations, as far as I can see…
btw they’re much nicer than Zurich, in Zurich I think if you misfile it they just deny it fully (they don’t correct it to only do the 15%)
I thought maybe a WIKI for this topic might be good. This keeps coming back.
Mods -: If this is irrelevant, please feel free to delete.
I also live in Graubunden and I am in exact same situation. My equities which bring dividends are stored in two brokerage accounts in: IBKR and Exante (Cyprus based). Previously when I lived in Kanton Zurich every year, I received some franks back after submitting DA-1.
This year Kanton Graubunden refused to return Steuerruckbehalt USA with the explanation:
“Der züsatliche Rüchbehalt USA wird nur auf Titeln gewährt, welche bei einer Schweizer Bank deponiert sind”?
So,if I understand this thread correct, if I had my equities in Swissquote, they would withhold 15%+15% tax but then I could claim it in full. Then I would add income from dividends to the annual income tax declaration, correct?
It’s not really received “back”, if you claimed/received more than what was withheld, right?
Yes, swiss brokers have the supplementary US withholding. And yes income from dividends should always be declared.
This sounds correct as has been explained in this thread. There is no “[zusätzlicher] Steuerrückbehalt USA” with foreign brokers such as IBKR, so there is nothing to refund in this regard. It seems like you’ve filled out the tax declaration incorrectly.
You should still get a tax credit via DA-1 for the 15% US WHT, if you’ve declared that part correctly, but the details depend on your individual situation.
In the best case you would get a tax credit or refund for both parts, yes. However, the end result is effectively the same as with IBKR. With a Swiss broker you’re forced to lend out an additional 15% until you actually get the refund, so IBKR is slightly better in this regard but there is no big difference.
Just to add to the confusion, the Swiss brokers will always deduct 30%, but, depending on the circumstance, you may only be able to reclaim half of it. That happens if the broker acted against your best interest and paid the other half to the US instead of Switzerland (happened to me, luckily just a few hundred francs lost).