# Tax optimisation for ETF investing

**URL:** https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67
**Category:** Wiki
**Created:** [October 31, 2016, 7:22am UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67 "2016-10-31T07:22:20Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/hedgehog/32/163_2.png) [@hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/hedgehog)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2018, 1:31pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/86 "2018-08-01T13:31:30Z")

</div>

No they often revise data later. Accumulating is worse than US distributing for US equities in every case i’ve checked in the past

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/maillekeule/32/741_2.png) [@maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/maillekeule)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2018, 2:03pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/87 "2018-08-01T14:03:32Z")

</div>

Thanks a lot for answering. Just a Question. You mean it is worse in terms of what exactly?

Dividend yield? Declaration to tax?

I am asking the Question since I have one accumulating fund which is WOSC (SPDR small cap - IE based) and was wondering whether I will only be taxed on dividend gain and not capital.

It is in the list and therefore I was assuming it is fine. Am I missing something?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/hedgehog/32/163_2.png) [@hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/hedgehog)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2018, 2:10pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/88 "2018-08-01T14:10:41Z")

</div>

> Thanks a lot for answering. Just a Question. You mean it is worse in terms of what exactly?

In terms of tax, duh - see the title of the thread

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/hedgehog/32/163_2.png) [@hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/hedgehog)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2018, 2:12pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/89 "2018-08-01T14:12:31Z")

</div>

> wondering whether I will only be taxed on dividend gain and not capital.

Yes. But you’ll get _double_ taxed on dividend, that’s the problem that US funds help alleviate, besides also having lower fees and being much cheaper to trade

For example, assuming you pay 40% marginal tax rate here and 100% US invested fund: with a distributing fund you pay 15% to US, get it all back from CH and pay 40% to CH. With an accumulating IE fund: you pay 15% to US and 85%\*40% = 34% to CH, for a total of 49%, or 22.5% more taxes than with a distributing fund. And then there are timing issues: they normally tax you for whole year’s (or half-year’s) dividend depending on whether you held the fund at a particular date, so you can owe a lot more swiss taxes than necessary by buying at a bad time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/maillekeule/32/741_2.png) [@maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/maillekeule)
#### Post date: [August 2, 2018, 2:29pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/90 "2018-08-02T14:29:25Z")

</div>

> [@hedgehog](#):
>
> Yes. But you’ll get _double_ taxed on dividend,

Just to make it clear: I already have a IE distributing fund (VWRL). I understand that taxation is similar for a distributing or accumulating IE fund. Is this correct?

As far as WOSC (small cap IE00BCBJG560) is concerned . I am bit surprised to see that the taxable dividend for 2017 is 0,53 USD while the Client brochure I received says that it gave 1,44 USD per share. Any idea?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/maillekeule/32/741_2.png) [@maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/maillekeule)
#### Post date: [August 2, 2018, 9:04pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/91 "2018-08-02T21:04:44Z")

</div>

> [@nugget](#):
>
> ## 1.3 US domiciled funds
> 
> for dividends distributed by US domiciled companies of Funds to US domiciled investors or Funds, L1WT is **zero**.
> 
> however, for foreign investors (swiss domiciled…), by default, US based funds & companies pay **30%** (=L2WT) of witholding Tax from distributed dividends to the US tax authorities. **BUT** , the swiss-american tax treaty (see below) allows to reduce this to **15%** for swiss residents. But it takes some effort to get there: you need to file a [W8-BEN](https://www.google.ch/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiSnuKx16nUAhVIvBQKHT7cAQcQFggmMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.irs.gov%2Fpub%2Firs-pdf%2Ffw8ben.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGekkGZqy2mTlzoCu4-bq6oPNltaw) form for this. Your broker needs to be a “qualified intermediary” for this. From IB we know they directly do it when you sign up. CT does not support this as this Guide is being written. [info on other brokers is missing]  
> After successfully reducing your Witholding tax to 15%, you can file a [DA-1](https://www.fin.be.ch/fin/de/index/steuern/ratgeber/formulare/einkommens-_und_vermoegenssteuer.assetref/dam/documents/FIN/SV/de/Formulare/Einkommens_Vermoegenssteuer/Aktuelles_Steuerjahr/form_ev_da-1_de.pdf) ([more info](https://www.steueramt.zh.ch/internet/finanzdirektion/ksta/de/steuererklaerung/formulare-merkblaetter/_jcr_content/contentPar/form_4/formitems/wegleitung_zum_da_1_/download.spooler.download.1451971495251.pdf/438+Wegleitung+DA1_DA-3+2015+DEF.pdf)) to have this remaining tax accounted for when your income tax is calculated.

Amazing summary.

I am still wondering whether to buy directly from an american broker and move from VWRL to VT for instance. Am I right to understand that through DA-1 you only get the remaining tax back from the tax declaration ie. several months after?

Also what About the form W8-BEN if I own the Shares together with my Partner?  
Thanks a lot

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/maillekeule/32/741_2.png) [@maillekeule](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/maillekeule)
#### Post date: [August 3, 2018, 2:31pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/92 "2018-08-03T14:31:25Z")

</div>

> [@maillekeule](#):
>
> As far as WOSC (small cap IE00BCBJG560) is concerned . I am bit surprised to see that the taxable dividend for 2017 is 0,53 USD while the Client brochure I received says that it gave 1,44 USD per share. Any idea?

I am autoquoting myself but I asked the question today to the Swiss authorities and they replied the following regarding accumulative funds:

“The amount of USD 0.53 is for the income tax and has to be added on the tax declaration as taxable income. If a fund makes no distributions, he qualifies as a capitalization fund. The accumulations are calculated according to certain specifications. See the number 3.5.1 In circular no. 24 of the FTA (just in German). The reinvestment of USD 1.4433 is therefore irrelevant for Swiss tax purposes and only applies to the UK/Ireland.”

Therefore with a dividend of 1.44 USD in an accumulative fund it seems that in the end you only pay the income tax on 0.53 USD ie.35%. Any comment regarding this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/hedgehog/32/163_2.png) [@hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/hedgehog)
#### Post date: [August 3, 2018, 4:31pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/93 "2018-08-03T16:31:15Z")

</div>

Must have been a glitch in the system or miscalculation in your favor, enjoy it in this particular case. Considering its TER though you’re still likely better off with something like VSS.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Grog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/grog/32/3483_2.png) [@Grog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/Grog)
#### Post date: [September 8, 2018, 6:37am UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/94 "2018-09-08T06:37:15Z")

</div>

@nugget why in the excel VTI has a lw2 dividend withdrawal? Isn’t it a pure US ETf and you can use the da 1?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nugget](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/nugget/32/57_2.png) [@nugget](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/nugget)
#### Post date: [September 8, 2018, 7:21am UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/95 "2018-09-08T07:21:48Z")

</div>

Hey Grog, good observation. When I made the document it looked like in the screenshot of the initial post, i.e. some user modified it (as i asked for). I added a line accounting for the DA-1, as far as I think it’s correct. that gets VTI down to a whooping 0.04% total costs!

as far as I remember this table points out that your VTI dividends will be widthold 15% by IRA. Yes, the DA-1 should allow you to credit these taxes in your tax declaration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Runner](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/runner/32/1481_2.png) [@Runner](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/Runner)
#### Post date: [November 29, 2018, 4:06pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/96 "2018-11-29T16:06:21Z")

</div>

Hi @nugget

Thank you for this very informative thread.

In your previous post you mentioned:

> [@&quot;nugget](#):
>
> the very rugh summary of the above is
> 
> - if your fund holds mostly US domiciled underlyings, go for and US domiciled fund
> 
> - if your fund holds mostly non-US-domiciled underlyings, consider the IE domiciled fund

And in this post you explain why you would select a US based VXUS instead of some IE-based alternative.

I was thinking to start with investing in the following ETFs: VTI+VXUS, but then after reading your summary above (“if your fund holds mostly non-US-domiciled underlyings, consider the IE domiciled fund”) I was considering finding a European alternative to VXUS. Specifically, instead of VTI+VXUS I was considering VTI+ MSCI EMU + MSCI Pacific **OR** VTI+MSCI EMU + MSCI Pacific ex-Japan + MSCI Japan. It would be nice to know your views on this.

Also (beginners question) does every ETF have “accumulating” option and a “distributing” option to select? How do I know if the fund accumulates or distributes?

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nugget](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/nugget/32/57_2.png) [@nugget](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/nugget)
#### Post date: [November 29, 2018, 6:10pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/97 "2018-11-29T18:10:14Z")

</div>

Hey runner,  
thanks for ready my guiide 🙂  
the short answer is there is no short answer to the US vs IE based question. there is a list of pros and cons, i myself went for the US based EM ETFs. my main reasons were that i like the US based vanguard funds, and that unlike with IE funds i can get down to 0% witholding tax non-declared with my swiss tax authority.

> does every ETF have “accumulating” option and a “distributing” option to select?

no. the majority does ot have.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Runner](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/runner/32/1481_2.png) [@Runner](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/Runner)
#### Post date: [November 29, 2018, 7:13pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/98 "2018-11-29T19:13:22Z")

</div>

Thanks so much @nugget !  
I will probably also stick with the US based EMFs (VTI+VXUS) just for simplicity, unity and convenience (to have all vanguard funds)

One last question, how do I know if a fund is “accumulating” of “distributing”? e.g. are VT, VTI and VXUS funds “accumulating” or “distributing”? (sorry for such a trivial question)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![glina](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/glina/32/820_2.png) [@glina](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/glina)
#### Post date: [November 29, 2018, 7:38pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/99 "2018-11-29T19:38:05Z")

</div>

> [@Runner](#):
>
> One last question, how do I know if a fund is “accumulating” of “distributing”? e.g. are VT, VTI and VXUS funds “accumulating” or “distributing”? (sorry for such a trivial question)

All US based ETFs are distributing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Runner](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/runner/32/1481_2.png) [@Runner](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/Runner)
#### Post date: [November 29, 2018, 7:42pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/100 "2018-11-29T19:42:01Z")

</div>

Super - thanks @glina !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nugget](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/nugget/32/57_2.png) [@nugget](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/nugget)
#### Post date: [November 29, 2018, 10:57pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/101 "2018-11-29T22:57:34Z")

</div>

> [@glina](#):
>
> All US based ETFs are distributing.

id think so too, but better check for the fact sheets. they specify yearly/ semi annual / quartely distribution

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dbu](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/dbu/32/1552_2.png) [@dbu](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/dbu)
#### Post date: [December 26, 2018, 11:27pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/103 "2018-12-26T23:27:45Z")

</div>

Hello everyone,

Any reason _not_ to choose VEA+VWO to cover for ex-US developed markets and emerging markets (all cap)?

I read about perhaps making sense to choose the funds whose domicile lies in the assets-covering country, but how do you do that when the assets lie practically around the whole world? 🙂  
Since these assets lie outside of the US, are there maybe better options with iShares or such - “better” regarding tax optimisation?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/hedgehog/32/163_2.png) [@hedgehog](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/hedgehog)
#### Post date: [December 27, 2018, 1:39pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/104 "2018-12-27T13:39:47Z")

</div>

> [@dbu](#):
>
> reason _not_ to choose VEA+VWO to cover for ex-US developed markets and emerging markets (all cap)?

you can buy whatever the f\*\*k you want, your money, your risk

> [@dbu](#):
>
> I read about perhaps making sense to choose the funds whose domicile lies in the assets-covering country

this is mostly only a concern about the US, less for other countries, first, market’s very fragmented outside the US, most countries are less than a few percent weight, and second, the tax savings for non-US are not that big actually, i’d buy US or IE fund for ex-US, it doesn’t matter much which domicile

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dbu](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/dbu/32/1552_2.png) [@dbu](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/dbu)
#### Post date: [December 27, 2018, 5:44pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/105 "2018-12-27T17:44:00Z")

</div>

> [@hedgehog](#):
>
> you can buy whatever the f\*\*k you want, your money, your risk

Hey no need for such a reaction, just asking for advice from the more experienced. 🙂

Thank you for Pt.2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bojack](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/user_avatar/forum.mustachianpost.com/bojack/32/281_2.png) [@Bojack](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/Bojack)
#### Post date: [December 28, 2018, 1:31pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67/106 "2018-12-28T13:31:02Z")

</div>

> [@hedgehog](#):
>
> you can buy whatever the f\*\*k you want, your money, your risk

That’s a bit over the top, IMO. It’s a good question. The only reason I see is simplicity, not needing to rebalance. If you go for VEA + VWO, you get:

- higher AUM of ETFs, more liquidity
- marginally lower TER
- more flexibility if you decide to overweigh

BTW I made a comparison chart for our wiki:

 ![image](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/uploads/default/original/2X/4/494c43d4972881009c8f09fbd4a9ef3d355a160e.png)

[Previous page](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/tax-optimisation-for-etf-investing/67.md?page=6)
