# Share your net worth progression

**URL:** <https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/share-your-net-worth-progression/4798>\
**Category:** Investing / Portfolios\
**Created:** [November 29, 2020, 3:07pm UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/share-your-net-worth-progression/4798 "2020-11-29T15:07:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 930

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon17469660](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/13edae/32.png) [@anon17469660](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/u/anon17469660)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2024, 11:17am UTC](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/share-your-net-worth-progression/4798/930 "2024-08-25T11:17:55Z")

</div>

> [@covfefe](#):
>
> Aren’t pension funds organised as trusts that are independent of the sponsor company (even if they bear the same name as a large company)? In that case whatever your boss/CEO (of the company) says on 1-1 basis is irrelevant to what the pension fund wants to enforce or not?

Yeah, well, probably … somewhat? See my rant [here](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/2nd-pillar-bvg-proposed-revision/7485/141) (2nd half of the post) for how my current company handles this.

Pretty sure this is the case for some other companies: an asset management company will try to have their pension fund invest in products of said asset management company. In our case, it’s part of the agreement.

In, say, UBS’s case, their pension fund probably almost has to invest into some UBS products just for size reasons (not enough large enough institutional investment products available by other Swiss players) if not contractually enforced.

 ![image](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/uploads/default/original/2X/6/68fb2dd4144366e74834cf740c3bc0ff1cb7e74d.jpeg)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.mustachianpost.com/t/share-your-net-worth-progression/4798)._