Quality of discussions

Treating inflammatory topics slightly different would solve many of the stated problems with smaller side effects. Namely:

  • Outside entities have a harder time misconstruing loud fringe voices as representative.
  • Newcomers see more base information first. Once they are invested they hopefully can put those discussions into perspective.
  • We don’t loose access to diverse viewpoints and beneficial ideological discussion. We don’t promote echo chambers.
  • We don’t need to cencor, we don’t need to ban. That should lower moderation demand.

But:

  • Certain people could still not bear the existence of contrary opinions and would still leave.
  • It doesn’t improve the quality (title of this topic).
1 Like