Just to share the pain for some encouragement. I made the same mistake early this year (yes, more painful because there have been plenty of posts warning about this). I just got out of the trap this month losing nearly 4,000fr of surrender value so… bite the bullet and move on. I suggest don’t reduce, just get out.
Hi
Thank for your feedback and sorry for your losses !
Well my question is not about continue or stop investing 6800/y in this 3rd pilar, I am already convinced in stock markets. But :
A] Would it be better to
a. close, withdraw everything, big losses, and ciao
b. reduce prime amount at 100/y (or sth else), reduced losses on long term
B] What about this topic in the context we’ll probably will live in a border country in 10-20 years
You have to determine the current (and/or future) surrender value and make an assumption for performance of your alternative VIAC/finpension portfolio.
We can’t advise you or answer that question without the figures.
(as a side note, being unable to easily determine the current surrender value for any well-diversified investment vehicle investment would be a huge red flag for me)
unless a detailed calculation/ simulation (excel is your friend) tells otherewise, clearly cancel the life insurance, and transfer the money to the 3rd pillar robo advisor depot of your choice.
then open 4 more depots. contribute only to those until they reach the value of your first depot.
Hi everyone,
I finally ask my insurance to get all data to analyze it (cf lower)
Currently, two contracts :
1 - A surrend value from an old contract, from 2020 to 2056, without any payment additionnal per year
2 - A new contrat from 2020 to 2056, 6500 paid once a year, can be reduced to 100/y minimum
I analyse all possible options with these contracts :
Basically, loss aversion, the endowment effect, and status quo bias drive this irrational escalation of commitment to the losing investment. Investors may even double down and buy more, colloquially described as “throwing good money after bad.” This is called the sunk cost fallacy, where people make irrational decisions to attempt to justify earlier decisions, instead of accepting that the bad decision is now a sunk cost that is likely unrecoverable.
Don’t stay emotionally attached to bad outcomes and dig yourself further in the hole. Assess the situation rationally, cut your losses, and move on.
Thanks, great thoughts !
In other words, Stop 1+2 ?
1 Like
By reading and partipating to this forum, you confirm you have read and agree with the disclaimer presented on http://www.mustachianpost.com/
En lisant et participant à ce forum, tu confirmes avoir lu et être d'accord avec l'avis de dégagement de responsabilité présenté sur http://www.mustachianpost.com/fr/
Durch das Lesen und die Teilnahme an diesem Forum bestätigst du, dass du den auf http://www.mustachianpost.com/de/ dargestellten Haftungsausschluss gelesen hast und damit einverstanden bist.