Chronicles of 2026 - the next chapter

Impact of Bessent’s jaw-boning fading fast. Maybe it did more harm than good: failed to manage the long term rates, but re-ignited the debasement trade.

It’s a finger in the dike, but you’re in a world of rising interest rates, fiscal profligacy and above-target inflation, and frankly the US has been an outperformer compared with other countries’ bond markets

1 Like

You say it’s “fading fast” but USDCHF (and, by extension, my spreadsheet) is still down a bunch over the last five days!

Impact on the long end of the rates is fading.

The impact on USD will be long lasting: hence the debasement trade.

Btw I suspect they might not care too much about long term impact, but it might be an election play.

The mortgage rates are benchmarked on those long dated bonds, so they might be thinking about electorate reaction there if the mortgate rates do go down (they’ve been pretty high for a while, contributing to the increased cost perception).

Similar to the move today where they’re dropping tariffs on beef import to try to lower prices.

1 Like

Someone on CNBC was saying that it might be a trick played by Bessent to scare of short sellers of US debt.

In my view US had a great thing going on with trade deficit which forced people to buy US debt to eventually get rid of their USDs. But now US is trying to reduce the deficit , China isn’t that keen to buy US debt (as they focus more on gold) , Japan is having their own issues, AI debt is competing against US govt debt too. So it wouldn’t be easy to sell 30 year US bonds at lower rates.

On top most likely countries who hold US bonds are trying to sell them to pay for higher costs of energy and crude.

2 Likes

2026 is more than half way over, but here’s one version of what could pan out for the rest of the year:

  • longer duration bond yields keep rising
  • Bessent tries to limit but it is not enough
  • Warsh makes a u-turn and starts an Operation Twist part 2: prints to buy the long end of the yield curve
  • Markets get spooked: gold goes higher, bitcoin goes higher - the debasement trade goes into full swing
  • Supports Trump Hamiltonian policies: strategic tariffs, industrial re-shoring, domestic product
  • Administration banks on stablecoin demand to soak up T-bill issuance
  • Maybe govt actions help AI investments if AI bonds become more attractive vs artificially lowered yields on govt bonds? Maybe credit spreads will finally widen although perhaps not in the good way I wanted.
2 Likes

You just described 2026 YTD as a model for the rest of the year. Good one :wink:

well Warsh hasn’t made a u-turn yet :wink:

He hasn’t had to. The Fed has resumed quantitative easing in December last year (so still under JPow).

A small fly in the US refining ointment: crude supplies tightening as Mexico directs more crude internally.

Also Canadian oil sands to go on planned maintenance and remove 300,000 barrels.

Maybe Venezuela, Canada and Middle East can pick up the slack.

I’d invested heavily in US refiners as the ones least likely to be disrupted by world events, but even the US refiners are not fully immune.

Question for the group.
If US treasury market keeps seeing higher yields - it’s obviously bad for bonds, but is it positive for equities or is it bad for everything (bonds & equities)

It’s bad for most things, including equities.

2 Likes

It’s worse for companies with debt to issue (higher costs) and not as bad for the debt-free ones

Discount rates up → prices lower, to varying degrees.

Maybe I’m mis-remembering, but don’t rising rates usually trigger recession stock market falls (after a time delay)?


Whilst we’re on the subject of bonds, I have an interesting chart here from Tom McClellan. It shows the correlation between gold (shifted forward by 20.5 months) and US bond yields. The chart clearly points to yields continuing to rise.


And an interesting thesis about equities: JPMorgan warns of an autumn correction: Despite the intact upward trends in the major US indices, JPMorgan sees growing risks of a setback in late summer or early autumn. Strategist Jason Hunter points to a narrowing market breadth, increasing rotation into defensive sectors and waning confidence in AI shares. JPMorgan is particularly critical of the parallels between the current AI boom and the technology euphoria of 1999/2000, noting that the heavy concentration of investor capital in tech stocks increases the risk of a setback. Additional headwinds include high Treasury yields, tensions in the Middle East and signs of weaker US consumer spending.

What’s the intuition for the 20 months? Because as is it doesn’t sound like a correlation, you can probably show a lot of similar correlations between two curves when cherry picking the time period esp if you allow time shifting :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

2 Likes

You’ll need to go back further than 2011 if you want to make a convincing argument for this relationship.

1 Like

As per Ruchir Sharma from Rockefeller „all historical bubbles end with increase in interest rates „

In his view US 10Y above 5% would be the breaking point

Found the video
Here

To diagnose bubbles, Sharma uses what he calls the four O’s. He said the AI boom is flashing red on all four: overinvestment, overvaluation, over-ownership, and over-leverage.

Interest rates raises tighten credit and put the less profitable companies into trouble. In times of crisis, central banks tend to cut rates so it seems fairly normal that rates raises and then tops precede the crises.

I’m not sure what to think of this one. Higher rates on government bonds creates competition and tightens credit conditions but if it stems from a loss of credit by the US Treasury, it might also spur more attractivity for corporate bonds. AI debt fueled investments make that field pretty crowded too right now, though.

I’d say the raising rates situation is bad for stocks as well as bonds but I wouldn’t bet the house on any directional move. There are other effects at play and, for example, the AI craze or fall from grace can move stocks in different directions with pretty wide magnitude.

Edit: also, some/many(?) companies have US Treasuries on their book so higher yields, meaning a loss of value for already issued bonds, would also be bad for them for that reason.